Alpha 230 A vs Kanga 366
How do the Alpha 230 A and Kanga 366 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 230 A | Alpha 230 A | Kanga 366 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 12.0 ft3.67 m | 12.0 ft3.66 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 2.2 ft0.67 m | 2.1 ft0.65 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 44 lb20 kg | 33 lb15 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.49 | 2.66 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 230 A vs Kanga 366: the short version
- The Alpha 230 A and Kanga 366 are close in length (12.0 ft3.67 m vs 12.0 ft3.66 m ).
- The Alpha 230 A is heavier, displacing about 33% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 230 A rates better for offshore work (2.49 vs 2.66).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.