Alpha 29 vs Cornish Crabber 24
How do the Alpha 29 and Cornish Crabber 24 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 29 | Alpha 29 | Cornish Crabber 24 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.4 ft8.95 m | 29.3 ft8.92 m |
| Waterline length | 23.6 ft7.20 m | 20.3 ft6.17 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.84 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 4.7 ft1.42 m |
| Displacement | 7,275 lb3,300 kg | 4,600 lb2,087 kg |
| Ballast | 3,042 lb1,380 kg | 600 lb272 kg |
| Sail area | 408 ft²37.9 m² | 305 ft²28.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.39 | 17.64 |
| Displacement / Length | 246 | 247 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.7 | 19.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.92 | 1.92 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.0 |
Alpha 29 vs Cornish Crabber 24: the short version
- The Alpha 29 and Cornish Crabber 24 are close in length (29.4 ft8.95 m vs 29.3 ft8.92 m ).
- The Alpha 29 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Cornish Crabber 24 carries the more powerful rig (17.6 vs 17.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Alpha 29 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 29 rates better for offshore work (1.92 vs 1.92).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.