Alpha 95 S vs Crit 270
How do the Alpha 95 S and Crit 270 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 95 S | Alpha 95 S | Crit 270 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 8.9 ft2.70 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 1.9 ft0.58 m | 1.8 ft0.56 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 20 lb9 kg | 20 lb9 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.80 | 2.71 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 95 S vs Crit 270: the short version
- The Alpha 95 S and Crit 270 are close in length (8.9 ft2.70 m vs 8.9 ft2.70 m ).
- By the capsize screening formula the Crit 270 rates better for offshore work (2.71 vs 2.80).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.