Alpha 95 S vs Hookipa Naish
How do the Alpha 95 S and Hookipa Naish compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Alpha 95 S | Alpha 95 S | Hookipa Naish | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 8.9 ft2.70 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Waterline length | —— | —— |
| Beam | 1.9 ft0.58 m | 1.9 ft0.57 m |
| Draft | —— | —— |
| Displacement | 20 lb9 kg | 18 lb8 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | — |
| Comfort ratio | — | — |
| Capsize screening | 2.80 | 2.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | — |
Alpha 95 S vs Hookipa Naish: the short version
- The Alpha 95 S and Hookipa Naish are close in length (8.9 ft2.70 m vs 8.5 ft2.60 m ).
- The Alpha 95 S is heavier, displacing about 11% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Alpha 95 S rates better for offshore work (2.80 vs 2.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.