AMF Apollo 16 vs Puffer
How do the AMF Apollo 16 and Puffer compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
AMF Apollo 16 | AMF Apollo 16 | Puffer | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 15.8 ft4.80 m | 12.5 ft3.81 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 11.5 ft3.51 m |
| Beam | 5.9 ft1.80 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Draft | 2.6 ft0.79 m | 2.8 ft0.86 m |
| Displacement | 300 lb136 kg | 160 lb73 kg |
| Ballast | —— | —— |
| Sail area | 129 ft²12.0 m² | 90 ft²8.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 46.06 | 48.86 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 47 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 2.6 |
| Capsize screening | 3.54 | 3.56 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 4.5 |
AMF Apollo 16 vs Puffer: the short version
- The AMF Apollo 16 is the larger boat at 15.8 ft4.80 m LOA versus 12.5 ft3.81 m for the Puffer.
- The AMF Apollo 16 is heavier, displacing about 88% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Puffer carries the more powerful rig (48.9 vs 46.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the AMF Apollo 16 rates better for offshore work (3.54 vs 3.56).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.