Amigo 23 vs Santana 22
How do the Amigo 23 and Santana 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amigo 23 | Amigo 23 | Santana 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.3 ft6.80 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 17.7 ft5.40 m | 18.8 ft5.71 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 3.5 ft1.07 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 2,600 lb1,179 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,230 lb558 kg |
| Sail area | 237 ft²22.0 m² | 218 ft²20.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | 18.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 318 | 176 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.7 | 13.9 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.8 |
| Average used price | €2,100 | — |
Amigo 23 vs Santana 22: the short version
- The Amigo 23 and Santana 22 are close in length (22.3 ft6.80 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Amigo 23 is heavier, displacing about 53% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Santana 22 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 15.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amigo 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amigo 23 rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.