Amigo 23 vs Starwind 223
How do the Amigo 23 and Starwind 223 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amigo 23 
Starwind 223 | Amigo 23 | Starwind 223 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 22.3 ft6.80 m | 22.3 ft6.78 m |
| Waterline length | 17.7 ft5.40 m | 19.3 ft5.89 m |
| Beam | 7.5 ft2.30 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 3.7 ft1.12 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,968 lb1,800 kg | 2,435 lb1,104 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 700 lb318 kg |
| Sail area | 237 ft²22.0 m² | 221 ft²20.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 15.13 | 19.54 |
| Displacement / Length | 318 | 151 |
| Comfort ratio | 21.7 | 10.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.91 | 2.53 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €2,100 | — |
Amigo 23 vs Starwind 223: the short version
- The Amigo 23 and Starwind 223 are close in length (22.3 ft6.80 m vs 22.3 ft6.78 m ).
- The Amigo 23 is heavier, displacing about 63% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Starwind 223 carries the more powerful rig (19.5 vs 15.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amigo 23 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amigo 23 rates better for offshore work (1.91 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.