Amigo 27 vs Beachcomber 25
How do the Amigo 27 and Beachcomber 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amigo 27 | Amigo 27 | Beachcomber 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 25.3 ft7.72 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 6,614 lb3,000 kg | 5,200 lb2,359 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 275 ft²25.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.21 | 14.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 387 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.2 | 21.2 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €6,000 | — |
Amigo 27 vs Beachcomber 25: the short version
- The Amigo 27 and Beachcomber 25 are close in length (25.3 ft7.70 m vs 25.3 ft7.72 m ).
- The Amigo 27 is heavier, displacing about 27% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Beachcomber 25 carries the more powerful rig (14.7 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amigo 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amigo 27 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 1.85).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.