Amigo 27 vs Bombardier 7.6
How do the Amigo 27 and Bombardier 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amigo 27 
Bombardier 7.6 | Amigo 27 | Bombardier 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 25.3 ft7.72 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 6,614 lb3,000 kg | 3,300 lb1,497 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 985 lb447 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.21 | 21.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 387 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.2 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €6,000 | — |
Amigo 27 vs Bombardier 7.6: the short version
- The Amigo 27 and Bombardier 7.6 are close in length (25.3 ft7.70 m vs 25.3 ft7.72 m ).
- The Amigo 27 is heavier, displacing about 100% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Bombardier 7.6 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amigo 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amigo 27 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.