Amigo 27 vs C&C 25
How do the Amigo 27 and C&C 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amigo 27 | Amigo 27 | C&C 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.3 ft7.70 m | 25.2 ft7.68 m |
| Waterline length | 19.7 ft6.00 m | 20.5 ft6.25 m |
| Beam | 8.4 ft2.55 m | 8.8 ft2.67 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 3.8 ft1.17 m |
| Displacement | 6,614 lb3,000 kg | 4,189 lb1,900 kg |
| Ballast | 2,646 lb1,200 kg | 1,984 lb900 kg |
| Sail area | 291 ft²27.0 m² | 344 ft²32.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 13.21 | 21.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 387 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 28.2 | 16.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.78 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.9 | 6.1 |
| Average used price | €6,000 | €5,000 |
Amigo 27 vs C&C 25: the short version
- The Amigo 27 and C&C 25 are close in length (25.3 ft7.70 m vs 25.2 ft7.68 m ).
- The Amigo 27 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.2 vs 13.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amigo 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amigo 27 rates better for offshore work (1.78 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.