Amigo 33 vs C&C 29
How do the Amigo 33 and C&C 29 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amigo 33 
C&C 29 | Amigo 33 | C&C 29 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 29.5 ft9.00 m | 29.6 ft9.02 m |
| Waterline length | 23.5 ft7.15 m | 23.6 ft7.19 m |
| Beam | 9.2 ft2.80 m | 10.3 ft3.15 m |
| Draft | 4.6 ft1.40 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 8,157 lb3,700 kg | 7,500 lb3,402 kg |
| Ballast | 3,748 lb1,700 kg | 2,700 lb1,225 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 422 ft²39.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 17.62 |
| Displacement / Length | 282 | 255 |
| Comfort ratio | 26.0 | 20.4 |
| Capsize screening | 1.83 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Average used price | €10,000 | — |
Amigo 33 vs C&C 29: the short version
- The Amigo 33 and C&C 29 are close in length (29.5 ft9.00 m vs 29.6 ft9.02 m ).
- The Amigo 33 is heavier, displacing about 9% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Amigo 33 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amigo 33 rates better for offshore work (1.83 vs 2.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.