Amphibi-Con 25 vs Beachcomber 25
How do the Amphibi-Con 25 and Beachcomber 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amphibi-Con 25 | Amphibi-Con 25 | Beachcomber 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 25.3 ft7.72 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 23.0 ft7.01 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 5,200 lb2,359 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 275 ft²25.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.23 | 14.66 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 21.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 1.85 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
Amphibi-Con 25 vs Beachcomber 25: the short version
- The Amphibi-Con 25 and Beachcomber 25 are close in length (25.4 ft7.75 m vs 25.3 ft7.72 m ).
- The Beachcomber 25 is heavier, displacing about 49% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Amphibi-Con 25 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 14.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beachcomber 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beachcomber 25 rates better for offshore work (1.85 vs 2.04).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.