Amphibi-Con 25 vs Bombardier 7.6
How do the Amphibi-Con 25 and Bombardier 7.6 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amphibi-Con 25 
Bombardier 7.6 | Amphibi-Con 25 | Bombardier 7.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 25.3 ft7.72 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 3,300 lb1,497 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 985 lb447 kg |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 299 ft²27.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.23 | 21.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 12.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.28 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
Amphibi-Con 25 vs Bombardier 7.6: the short version
- The Amphibi-Con 25 and Bombardier 7.6 are close in length (25.4 ft7.75 m vs 25.3 ft7.72 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Bombardier 7.6 carries the more powerful rig (21.6 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amphibi-Con 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amphibi-Con 25 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.