Amphibi-Con 25 vs C&C SR 25
How do the Amphibi-Con 25 and C&C SR 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amphibi-Con 25 | Amphibi-Con 25 | C&C SR 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.5 ft2.59 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 5.4 ft1.65 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 1,860 lb844 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 2,074 ft²192.7 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.23 | 219.41 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 90 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 7.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.76 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.1 |
Amphibi-Con 25 vs C&C SR 25: the short version
- The Amphibi-Con 25 and C&C SR 25 are close in length (25.4 ft7.75 m vs 25.5 ft7.77 m ).
- The Amphibi-Con 25 is heavier, displacing about 88% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C SR 25 carries the more powerful rig (219.4 vs 19.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amphibi-Con 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amphibi-Con 25 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.76).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.