Amphibi-Con 25 vs Etap 23il
How do the Amphibi-Con 25 and Etap 23il compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Amphibi-Con 25 | Amphibi-Con 25 | Etap 23il | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 25.4 ft7.75 m | 25.5 ft7.77 m |
| Waterline length | 21.7 ft6.61 m | 20.3 ft6.19 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.36 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Draft | 4.3 ft1.30 m | 4.8 ft1.47 m |
| Displacement | 3,500 lb1,588 kg | 3,420 lb1,551 kg |
| Ballast | 1,100 lb499 kg | 1,035 lb469 kg |
| Sail area | 277 ft²25.7 m² | 213 ft²19.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 19.23 | 15.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 182 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.5 | 14.7 |
| Capsize screening | 2.04 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.0 |
Amphibi-Con 25 vs Etap 23il: the short version
- The Amphibi-Con 25 and Etap 23il are close in length (25.4 ft7.75 m vs 25.5 ft7.77 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Amphibi-Con 25 carries the more powerful rig (19.2 vs 15.0), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Amphibi-Con 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Amphibi-Con 25 rates better for offshore work (2.04 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.