Annie 30 vs C&C 30
How do the Annie 30 and C&C 30 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Annie 30 
C&C 30 | Annie 30 | C&C 30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 24.9 ft7.60 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 10.0 ft3.05 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 5.0 ft1.52 m |
| Displacement | 11,027 lb5,002 kg | 8,000 lb3,629 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 3,450 lb1,565 kg |
| Sail area | 458 ft²42.5 m² | 459 ft²42.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.79 | 18.36 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 231 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.5 | 21.8 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 2.00 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Annie 30 vs C&C 30: the short version
- The Annie 30 and C&C 30 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Annie 30 is heavier, displacing about 38% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the C&C 30 carries the more powerful rig (18.4 vs 14.8), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Annie 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Annie 30 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.00).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.