Annie 30 vs Hunter 31-2
How do the Annie 30 and Hunter 31-2 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
| Annie 30 | Hunter 31-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 30.0 ft9.14 m | 30.0 ft9.14 m |
| Waterline length | 24.5 ft7.47 m | 28.1 ft8.56 m |
| Beam | 9.5 ft2.90 m | 11.1 ft3.38 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 3.9 ft1.19 m |
| Displacement | 11,027 lb5,002 kg | 8,505 lb3,858 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,571 lb1,166 kg |
| Sail area | 458 ft²42.5 m² | 351 ft²32.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 14.79 | 13.48 |
| Displacement / Length | 335 | 171 |
| Comfort ratio | 32.5 | 18.6 |
| Capsize screening | 1.71 | 2.17 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.6 | 7.1 |
Annie 30 vs Hunter 31-2: the short version
- The Annie 30 and Hunter 31-2 are close in length (30.0 ft9.14 m vs 30.0 ft9.14 m ).
- The Annie 30 is heavier, displacing about 30% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Annie 30 carries the more powerful rig (14.8 vs 13.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Annie 30 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Annie 30 rates better for offshore work (1.71 vs 2.17).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.
Hunter 31-2