Antrim 20 vs Beneteau First 210
How do the Antrim 20 and Beneteau First 210 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Antrim 20 | Antrim 20 | Beneteau First 210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 20.4 ft6.22 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Waterline length | 17.5 ft5.33 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 8.0 ft2.44 m | 8.1 ft2.48 m |
| Draft | 4.0 ft1.22 m | 5.8 ft1.78 m |
| Displacement | 1,850 lb839 kg | 2,225 lb1,009 kg |
| Ballast | 750 lb340 kg | 772 lb350 kg |
| Sail area | 226 ft²21.0 m² | 237 ft²22.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.99 | 22.25 |
| Displacement / Length | 154 | 130 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.7 | 10.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.61 | 2.49 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.6 | 5.9 |
Antrim 20 vs Beneteau First 210: the short version
- The Antrim 20 and Beneteau First 210 are close in length (20.4 ft6.22 m vs 20.3 ft6.20 m ).
- The Beneteau First 210 is heavier, displacing about 20% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Antrim 20 carries the more powerful rig (24.0 vs 22.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Beneteau First 210 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Beneteau First 210 rates better for offshore work (2.49 vs 2.61).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.