Aphrodite 25 vs Bayfield 25
How do the Aphrodite 25 and Bayfield 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aphrodite 25 
Bayfield 25 | Aphrodite 25 | Bayfield 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 2.9 ft0.89 m |
| Displacement | 4,409 lb2,000 kg | 3,500 lb1,588 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,300 lb590 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 289 ft²26.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.78 | 20.06 |
| Displacement / Length | 194 | 205 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.3 | 15.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 5.9 |
| Average used price | €7,000 | — |
Aphrodite 25 vs Bayfield 25: the short version
- The Aphrodite 25 and Bayfield 25 are close in length (24.9 ft7.60 m vs 25.0 ft7.62 m ).
- The Aphrodite 25 is heavier, displacing about 26% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aphrodite 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 20.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bayfield 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bayfield 25 rates better for offshore work (2.11 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.