Aphrodite 25 vs Bremer 25
How do the Aphrodite 25 and Bremer 25 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aphrodite 25 | Aphrodite 25 | Bremer 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 24.9 ft7.60 m | 25.0 ft7.62 m |
| Waterline length | 21.6 ft6.60 m | 22.5 ft6.86 m |
| Beam | 9.3 ft2.85 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 5.1 ft1.55 m | 6.2 ft1.88 m |
| Displacement | 4,409 lb2,000 kg | 3,800 lb1,724 kg |
| Ballast | 1,984 lb900 kg | 1,600 lb726 kg |
| Sail area | 366 ft²34.0 m² | 310 ft²28.8 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 21.78 | 20.37 |
| Displacement / Length | 194 | 149 |
| Comfort ratio | 15.3 | 15.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.28 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.2 | 6.4 |
| Average used price | €7,000 | — |
Aphrodite 25 vs Bremer 25: the short version
- The Aphrodite 25 and Bremer 25 are close in length (24.9 ft7.60 m vs 25.0 ft7.62 m ).
- The Aphrodite 25 is heavier, displacing about 16% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aphrodite 25 carries the more powerful rig (21.8 vs 20.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bremer 25 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bremer 25 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.28).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.