Aquarius 21 vs Buccaneer 210
How do the Aquarius 21 and Buccaneer 210 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Aquarius 21 | Aquarius 21 | Buccaneer 210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 21.0 ft6.40 m | 20.8 ft6.35 m |
| Waterline length | 18.3 ft5.56 m | 18.3 ft5.59 m |
| Beam | 7.8 ft2.38 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 4.5 ft1.37 m | 2.0 ft0.61 m |
| Displacement | 1,900 lb862 kg | 3,000 lb1,361 kg |
| Ballast | 665 lb302 kg | 900 lb408 kg |
| Sail area | 163 ft²15.1 m² | 198 ft²18.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 17.00 | 15.23 |
| Displacement / Length | 140 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 9.9 | 15.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.53 | 2.22 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 5.7 | 5.7 |
Aquarius 21 vs Buccaneer 210: the short version
- The Aquarius 21 and Buccaneer 210 are close in length (21.0 ft6.40 m vs 20.8 ft6.35 m ).
- The Buccaneer 210 is heavier, displacing about 58% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Aquarius 21 carries the more powerful rig (17.0 vs 15.2), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Buccaneer 210 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Buccaneer 210 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.53).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.