Archambault A13 vs Archambault A35R
How do the Archambault A13 and Archambault A35R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A13 | Archambault A13 | Archambault A35R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.11 m | 36.3 ft11.06 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 30.2 ft9.20 m |
| Beam | 13.6 ft4.14 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Draft | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Displacement | 14,220 lb6,450 kg | 9,811 lb4,450 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 727 ft²67.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 25.38 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 159 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.4 |
Archambault A13 vs Archambault A35R: the short version
- The Archambault A13 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 36.3 ft11.06 m for the Archambault A35R.
- The Archambault A13 is heavier, displacing about 45% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35R rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.