Archambault A13 vs Archambault Coco
How do the Archambault A13 and Archambault Coco compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A13 | Archambault A13 | Archambault Coco | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.11 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 13.6 ft4.14 m | 8.9 ft2.70 m |
| Draft | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 4.5 ft1.36 m |
| Displacement | 14,220 lb6,450 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 992 lb450 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 285 ft²26.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 24.53 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 10.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 6.0 |
Archambault A13 vs Archambault Coco: the short version
- The Archambault A13 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 21.3 ft6.50 m for the Archambault Coco.
- The Archambault A13 is heavier, displacing about 461% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A13 rates better for offshore work (2.24 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.