Archambault A13 vs Brick
How do the Archambault A13 and Brick compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A13 | Archambault A13 | Brick | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.11 m | 31.3 ft9.55 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 31.3 ft9.55 m |
| Beam | 13.6 ft4.14 m | 8.2 ft2.50 m |
| Draft | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 3.9 ft1.20 m |
| Displacement | 14,220 lb6,450 kg | 3,968 lb1,800 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,543 lb700 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 272 ft²25.3 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 17.36 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 58 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 11.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.5 |
Archambault A13 vs Brick: the short version
- The Archambault A13 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 31.3 ft9.55 m for the Brick.
- The Archambault A13 is heavier, displacing about 258% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Brick rates better for offshore work (2.07 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.