Archambault A13 vs M34
How do the Archambault A13 and M34 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A13 
M34 | Archambault A13 | M34 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.11 m | 34.0 ft10.36 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 33.1 ft10.08 m |
| Beam | 13.6 ft4.14 m | 9.8 ft2.97 m |
| Draft | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 8.2 ft2.49 m |
| Displacement | 14,220 lb6,450 kg | 5,952 lb2,700 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 2,315 lb1,050 kg |
| Sail area | —— | 764 ft²71.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | — | 37.22 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 73 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 13.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.7 |
Archambault A13 vs M34: the short version
- The Archambault A13 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 34.0 ft10.36 m for the M34.
- The Archambault A13 is heavier, displacing about 139% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the M34 rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.24).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.