Archambault A13 vs Sprint 95
How do the Archambault A13 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A13 | Archambault A13 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 43.0 ft13.11 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 13.6 ft4.14 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 8.5 ft2.59 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 14,220 lb6,450 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | —— | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | —— | —— |
| SA / Displacement | — | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.24 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.0 |
Archambault A13 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Archambault A13 is the larger boat at 43.0 ft13.11 m LOA versus 31.1 ft9.48 m for the Sprint 95.
- The Archambault A13 is heavier, displacing about 187% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A13 rates better for offshore work (2.24 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.