Archambault A27 vs Archambault A35R
How do the Archambault A27 and Archambault A35R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Archambault A35R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 36.3 ft11.06 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 30.2 ft9.20 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 9,811 lb4,450 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 727 ft²67.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 25.38 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 159 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.4 |
Archambault A27 vs Archambault A35R: the short version
- The Archambault A35R is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.06 m LOA versus 27.4 ft8.35 m for the Archambault A27.
- The Archambault A35R is heavier, displacing about 107% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35R carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 25.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A35R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35R rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.