Archambault A27 vs Archambault A40RC
How do the Archambault A27 and Archambault A40RC compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Archambault A40RC | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 39.3 ft11.98 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 34.6 ft10.54 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 12.3 ft3.75 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 8.1 ft2.48 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 14,661 lb6,650 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 6,834 lb3,100 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 980 ft²91.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 26.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 158 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.9 |
Archambault A27 vs Archambault A40RC: the short version
- The Archambault A40RC is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.98 m LOA versus 27.4 ft8.35 m for the Archambault A27.
- The Archambault A40RC is heavier, displacing about 209% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A40RC carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 25.3), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40RC scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40RC rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.