Archambault A27 vs Archambault Coco
How do the Archambault A27 and Archambault Coco compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Archambault Coco | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 21.3 ft6.50 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 20.3 ft6.20 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 8.9 ft2.70 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 4.5 ft1.36 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 2,535 lb1,150 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 992 lb450 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 285 ft²26.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 24.53 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 134 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 10.4 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.60 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.0 |
Archambault A27 vs Archambault Coco: the short version
- The Archambault A27 is the larger boat at 27.4 ft8.35 m LOA versus 21.3 ft6.50 m for the Archambault Coco.
- The Archambault A27 is heavier, displacing about 87% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A27 carries the more powerful rig (25.3 vs 24.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A27 rates better for offshore work (2.33 vs 2.60).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.