Archambault A27 vs Atlante
How do the Archambault A27 and Atlante compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Atlante | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 27.8 ft8.47 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 8.1 ft2.47 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 260 ft²24.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 13.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 255 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.1 |
Archambault A27 vs Atlante: the short version
- The Archambault A27 and Atlante are close in length (27.4 ft8.35 m vs 27.8 ft8.47 m ).
- The Atlante is heavier, displacing about 12% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A27 carries the more powerful rig (25.3 vs 13.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Atlante scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Atlante rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.