Archambault A27 vs Bianca 26/28
How do the Archambault A27 and Bianca 26/28 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Bianca 26/28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 20.0 ft6.10 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 8.5 ft2.60 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 5,071 lb2,300 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 2,205 lb1,000 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 431 ft²40.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 23.36 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 283 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 20.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 1.99 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.0 |
| Average used price | — | €6,100 |
Archambault A27 vs Bianca 26/28: the short version
- The Archambault A27 and Bianca 26/28 are close in length (27.4 ft8.35 m vs 27.6 ft8.40 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A27 carries the more powerful rig (25.3 vs 23.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Bianca 26/28 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Bianca 26/28 rates better for offshore work (1.99 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.