Archambault A27 vs Cal 27
How do the Archambault A27 and Cal 27 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Cal 27 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 27.3 ft8.33 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 22.3 ft6.81 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 9.0 ft2.74 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 4.5 ft1.37 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 5,400 lb2,449 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 2,725 lb1,236 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 349 ft²32.4 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 18.14 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 217 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 18.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.05 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.3 |
Archambault A27 vs Cal 27: the short version
- The Archambault A27 and Cal 27 are close in length (27.4 ft8.35 m vs 27.3 ft8.33 m ).
- The Cal 27 is heavier, displacing about 14% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A27 carries the more powerful rig (25.3 vs 18.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Cal 27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Cal 27 rates better for offshore work (2.05 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.