Archambault A27 vs Sprint 95
How do the Archambault A27 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 7.0 |
Archambault A27 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Sprint 95 is the larger boat at 31.1 ft9.48 m LOA versus 27.4 ft8.35 m for the Archambault A27.
- The Archambault A27 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Sprint 95 rates better for offshore work (2.25 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.