Archambault A27 vs Suspens
How do the Archambault A27 and Suspens compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A27 | Archambault A27 | Suspens | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 27.4 ft8.35 m | 30.4 ft9.25 m |
| Waterline length | 23.8 ft7.25 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 9.8 ft2.98 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 5.4 ft1.65 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 4,750 lb2,155 kg | 6,118 lb2,775 kg |
| Ballast | 1,764 lb800 kg | 1,830 lb830 kg |
| Sail area | 446 ft²41.4 m² | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.25 | 22.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 157 | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | 14.2 | 16.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.33 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 6.5 | 6.8 |
Archambault A27 vs Suspens: the short version
- The Suspens is the larger boat at 30.4 ft9.25 m LOA versus 27.4 ft8.35 m for the Archambault A27.
- The Suspens is heavier, displacing about 29% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A27 carries the more powerful rig (25.3 vs 22.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Suspens scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Suspens rates better for offshore work (2.15 vs 2.33).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.