Archambault A31 vs Archambault A35
How do the Archambault A31 and Archambault A35 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A31 | Archambault A31 | Archambault A35 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.3 ft9.54 m | 34.7 ft10.59 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 30.5 ft9.29 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 11.7 ft3.55 m |
| Draft | 6.2 ft1.88 m | 6.9 ft2.10 m |
| Displacement | 6,945 lb3,150 kg | 9,811 lb4,450 kg |
| Ballast | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 4,387 lb1,990 kg |
| Sail area | 555 ft²51.6 m² | 727 ft²67.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.39 | 25.38 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 155 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.18 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.4 |
Archambault A31 vs Archambault A35: the short version
- The Archambault A35 is the larger boat at 34.7 ft10.59 m LOA versus 31.3 ft9.54 m for the Archambault A31.
- The Archambault A35 is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35 carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 24.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.