Archambault A31 vs Archambault A35R
How do the Archambault A31 and Archambault A35R compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A31 | Archambault A31 | Archambault A35R | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.3 ft9.54 m | 36.3 ft11.06 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 30.2 ft9.20 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 11.6 ft3.53 m |
| Draft | 6.2 ft1.88 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Displacement | 6,945 lb3,150 kg | 9,811 lb4,450 kg |
| Ballast | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 4,630 lb2,100 kg |
| Sail area | 555 ft²51.6 m² | 727 ft²67.5 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 24.39 | 25.38 |
| Displacement / Length | — | 159 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 18.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.16 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.4 |
Archambault A31 vs Archambault A35R: the short version
- The Archambault A35R is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.06 m LOA versus 31.3 ft9.54 m for the Archambault A31.
- The Archambault A35R is heavier, displacing about 41% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35R carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 24.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35R rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.22).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.