Archambault A31 vs Sprint 95
How do the Archambault A31 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A31 | Archambault A31 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 31.3 ft9.54 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | —— | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 10.6 ft3.22 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 6.2 ft1.88 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 6,945 lb3,150 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 2,976 lb1,350 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 555 ft²51.6 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 24.39 | — |
| Displacement / Length | — | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | — | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.22 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | — | 7.0 |
Archambault A31 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Archambault A31 and Sprint 95 are close in length (31.3 ft9.54 m vs 31.1 ft9.48 m ).
- The Archambault A31 is heavier, displacing about 40% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A31 rates better for offshore work (2.22 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.