Archambault A35 vs Archambault A40RC
How do the Archambault A35 and Archambault A40RC compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35 | Archambault A35 | Archambault A40RC | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.7 ft10.59 m | 39.3 ft11.98 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.29 m | 34.6 ft10.54 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.55 m | 12.3 ft3.75 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 8.1 ft2.48 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 14,661 lb6,650 kg |
| Ballast | 4,387 lb1,990 kg | 6,834 lb3,100 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 980 ft²91.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 26.18 |
| Displacement / Length | 155 | 158 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 22.3 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.01 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.9 |
Archambault A35 vs Archambault A40RC: the short version
- The Archambault A40RC is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.98 m LOA versus 34.7 ft10.59 m for the Archambault A35.
- The Archambault A40RC is heavier, displacing about 49% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A40RC carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 25.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40RC scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40RC rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.18).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.