Archambault A35 vs Archambault Grand Surprise
How do the Archambault A35 and Archambault Grand Surprise compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35 
Archambault Grand Surprise | Archambault A35 | Archambault Grand Surprise | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.7 ft10.59 m | 31.3 ft9.54 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.29 m | 29.3 ft8.93 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.55 m | 9.8 ft2.98 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 6.7 ft2.05 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 58 lb26 kg |
| Ballast | 4,387 lb1,990 kg | 2,315 lb1,050 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 602 ft²55.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 642.83 |
| Displacement / Length | 155 | 1 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 0.1 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 10.11 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.3 |
Archambault A35 vs Archambault Grand Surprise: the short version
- The Archambault A35 is the larger boat at 34.7 ft10.59 m LOA versus 31.3 ft9.54 m for the Archambault Grand Surprise.
- The Archambault A35 is heavier, displacing about 16816% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Grand Surprise carries the more powerful rig (642.8 vs 25.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 10.11).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.