Archambault A35 vs Sprint 95
How do the Archambault A35 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35 | Archambault A35 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.7 ft10.59 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.29 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.55 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 4,387 lb1,990 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 155 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.0 |
Archambault A35 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Archambault A35 is the larger boat at 34.7 ft10.59 m LOA versus 31.1 ft9.48 m for the Sprint 95.
- The Archambault A35 is heavier, displacing about 98% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Archambault A35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.