Archambault A35 vs Sprinto
How do the Archambault A35 and Sprinto compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35 
Sprinto | Archambault A35 | Sprinto | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 34.7 ft10.59 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 30.5 ft9.29 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 11.7 ft3.55 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 6.9 ft2.10 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | 4,387 lb1,990 kg | 441 lb200 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 203 ft²18.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 26.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 155 | 60 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 6.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.18 | 2.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 6.2 |
Archambault A35 vs Sprinto: the short version
- The Archambault A35 is the larger boat at 34.7 ft10.59 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.60 m for the Sprinto.
- The Archambault A35 is heavier, displacing about 642% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sprinto carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 25.4), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A35 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35 rates better for offshore work (2.18 vs 2.74).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.