Archambault A35R vs Archambault A40
How do the Archambault A35R and Archambault A40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35R | Archambault A35R | Archambault A40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.06 m | 39.3 ft11.99 m |
| Waterline length | 30.2 ft9.20 m | 36.9 ft11.25 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 12.3 ft3.76 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.19 m | 7.9 ft2.41 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 13,669 lb6,200 kg |
| Ballast | 4,630 lb2,100 kg | 5,512 lb2,500 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 838 ft²77.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 23.45 |
| Displacement / Length | 159 | 121 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 19.8 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.06 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 8.1 |
Archambault A35R vs Archambault A40: the short version
- The Archambault A40 is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.99 m LOA versus 36.3 ft11.06 m for the Archambault A35R.
- The Archambault A40 is heavier, displacing about 39% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35R carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.