Archambault A35R vs Atlante
How do the Archambault A35R and Atlante compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35R | Archambault A35R | Atlante | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.06 m | 27.8 ft8.47 m |
| Waterline length | 30.2 ft9.20 m | 21.0 ft6.40 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 8.1 ft2.47 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.19 m | 4.3 ft1.30 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 5,300 lb2,404 kg |
| Ballast | 4,630 lb2,100 kg | —— |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 260 ft²24.2 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 13.68 |
| Displacement / Length | 159 | 255 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 21.9 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.86 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 6.1 |
Archambault A35R vs Atlante: the short version
- The Archambault A35R is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.06 m LOA versus 27.8 ft8.47 m for the Atlante.
- The Archambault A35R is heavier, displacing about 85% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35R carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 13.7), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Atlante scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Atlante rates better for offshore work (1.86 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.