Archambault A35R vs Rival 22
How do the Archambault A35R and Rival 22 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35R | Archambault A35R | Rival 22 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.06 m | 36.3 ft11.07 m |
| Waterline length | 30.2 ft9.20 m | 27.1 ft8.25 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 8.0 ft2.44 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.19 m | 4.9 ft1.50 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 5,732 lb2,600 kg |
| Ballast | 4,630 lb2,100 kg | 2,646 lb1,200 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | 452 ft²42.0 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | 22.58 |
| Displacement / Length | 159 | 129 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 18.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 1.79 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.0 |
| Average used price | — | €7,900 |
Archambault A35R vs Rival 22: the short version
- The Archambault A35R and Rival 22 are close in length (36.3 ft11.06 m vs 36.3 ft11.07 m ).
- The Archambault A35R is heavier, displacing about 71% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A35R carries the more powerful rig (25.4 vs 22.6), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Rival 22 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Rival 22 rates better for offshore work (1.79 vs 2.16).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.