Archambault A35R vs Sprint 95
How do the Archambault A35R and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A35R | Archambault A35R | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 36.3 ft11.06 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 30.2 ft9.20 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 11.6 ft3.53 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 7.2 ft2.19 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 9,811 lb4,450 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 4,630 lb2,100 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 727 ft²67.5 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 25.38 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 159 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 18.1 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.16 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.4 | 7.0 |
Archambault A35R vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Archambault A35R is the larger boat at 36.3 ft11.06 m LOA versus 31.1 ft9.48 m for the Sprint 95.
- The Archambault A35R is heavier, displacing about 98% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Archambault A35R scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A35R rates better for offshore work (2.16 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.