Archambault A40 vs Archambault Bagheera
How do the Archambault A40 and Archambault Bagheera compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40 | Archambault A40 | Archambault Bagheera | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.99 m | 19.7 ft6.00 m |
| Waterline length | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 15.6 ft4.75 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Draft | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 3.1 ft0.95 m |
| Displacement | 13,669 lb6,200 kg | 882 lb400 kg |
| Ballast | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 463 lb210 kg |
| Sail area | 838 ft²77.9 m² | 184 ft²17.1 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.45 | 32.01 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 104 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 7.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.47 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 5.3 |
Archambault A40 vs Archambault Bagheera: the short version
- The Archambault A40 is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.99 m LOA versus 19.7 ft6.00 m for the Archambault Bagheera.
- The Archambault A40 is heavier, displacing about 1450% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault Bagheera carries the more powerful rig (32.0 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.47).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.