Archambault A40 vs Sprint 95
How do the Archambault A40 and Sprint 95 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40 | Archambault A40 | Sprint 95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.99 m | 31.1 ft9.48 m |
| Waterline length | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 27.6 ft8.40 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 9.6 ft2.92 m |
| Draft | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 13,669 lb6,200 kg | 4,950 lb2,245 kg |
| Ballast | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 1,764 lb800 kg |
| Sail area | 838 ft²77.9 m² | —— |
| SA / Displacement | 23.45 | — |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 106 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 13.2 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.25 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 7.0 |
Archambault A40 vs Sprint 95: the short version
- The Archambault A40 is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.99 m LOA versus 31.1 ft9.48 m for the Sprint 95.
- The Archambault A40 is heavier, displacing about 176% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- The Archambault A40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.25).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.