Archambault A40 vs Sprinto
How do the Archambault A40 and Sprinto compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40 
Sprinto | Archambault A40 | Sprinto | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.99 m | 21.6 ft6.60 m |
| Waterline length | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 21.5 ft6.55 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 7.5 ft2.29 m |
| Draft | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 5.3 ft1.60 m |
| Displacement | 13,669 lb6,200 kg | 1,323 lb600 kg |
| Ballast | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 441 lb200 kg |
| Sail area | 838 ft²77.9 m² | 203 ft²18.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.45 | 26.95 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 60 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 6.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.74 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 6.2 |
Archambault A40 vs Sprinto: the short version
- The Archambault A40 is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.99 m LOA versus 21.6 ft6.60 m for the Sprinto.
- The Archambault A40 is heavier, displacing about 933% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Sprinto carries the more powerful rig (27.0 vs 23.5), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.74).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.