Archambault A40 vs Suspens
How do the Archambault A40 and Suspens compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40 | Archambault A40 | Suspens | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.99 m | 30.4 ft9.25 m |
| Waterline length | 36.9 ft11.25 m | 25.6 ft7.80 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.76 m | 9.8 ft3.00 m |
| Draft | 7.9 ft2.41 m | 5.9 ft1.80 m |
| Displacement | 13,669 lb6,200 kg | 6,118 lb2,775 kg |
| Ballast | 5,512 lb2,500 kg | 1,830 lb830 kg |
| Sail area | 838 ft²77.9 m² | 462 ft²42.9 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 23.45 | 22.10 |
| Displacement / Length | 121 | 163 |
| Comfort ratio | 19.8 | 16.6 |
| Capsize screening | 2.06 | 2.15 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 8.1 | 6.8 |
Archambault A40 vs Suspens: the short version
- The Archambault A40 is the larger boat at 39.3 ft11.99 m LOA versus 30.4 ft9.25 m for the Suspens.
- The Archambault A40 is heavier, displacing about 123% more, which usually means a steadier but slower-to-accelerate hull.
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A40 carries the more powerful rig (23.5 vs 22.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Archambault A40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40 rates better for offshore work (2.06 vs 2.15).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.