Archambault A40RC vs Baltic 40
How do the Archambault A40RC and Baltic 40 compare? Below, their dimensions, displacement, sail area and the standard design ratios side by side, followed by a data-driven summary.
Archambault A40RC | Archambault A40RC | Baltic 40 | |
|---|---|---|
| Length overall | 39.3 ft11.98 m | 39.3 ft11.99 m |
| Waterline length | 34.6 ft10.54 m | 32.8 ft9.98 m |
| Beam | 12.3 ft3.75 m | 12.8 ft3.89 m |
| Draft | 8.1 ft2.48 m | 7.2 ft2.19 m |
| Displacement | 14,661 lb6,650 kg | 14,992 lb6,800 kg |
| Ballast | 6,834 lb3,100 kg | 6,173 lb2,800 kg |
| Sail area | 980 ft²91.0 m² | 803 ft²74.6 m² |
| SA / Displacement | 26.18 | 21.13 |
| Displacement / Length | 158 | 191 |
| Comfort ratio | 22.3 | 22.5 |
| Capsize screening | 2.01 | 2.07 |
| Hull speed (kn) | 7.9 | 7.7 |
Archambault A40RC vs Baltic 40: the short version
- The Archambault A40RC and Baltic 40 are close in length (39.3 ft11.98 m vs 39.3 ft11.99 m ).
- On sail area/displacement the Archambault A40RC carries the more powerful rig (26.2 vs 21.1), favouring lighter-air performance.
- The Baltic 40 scores higher on the Brewer comfort ratio, suggesting an easier motion in a seaway.
- By the capsize screening formula the Archambault A40RC rates better for offshore work (2.01 vs 2.07).
Ratios are guidelines computed from published specs; condition, layout and gear matter as much as the numbers.